Changes to the Law on Public Procurement | CCM

Changes to the Law on Public Procurement

Share
1 day
4 sessions
8 hours
10-20 participants

Programme goals

This training aims to familiarize participants with the amendments and supplements to the Law on Public Procurement and their practical implications. The training is intended for employees in the private and public sectors.

Contribution towards development of knowledge, skills and competences

Programme content

1. Key amendments and supplements to the Law on Public Procurement.

- Changes to value thresholds.
- Small-value procurements.
- Electronic marketplace for small-value procurements.
- Transparency.
- Digitalization of the public procurement system.
- Appeals procedure.

2. Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT) – The best balance between price and quality.

- New rules and approaches regarding MEAT.
- What MEAT means for economic operators.
- Price, quality, and cost – What is evaluated, and how these elements differ.
- When MEAT is a mandatory criterion.
- The distinction between determining capability (eligibility) and evaluating quality.
- Methodology for evaluation and scoring.
- Common mistakes.

3. Common mistakes in the preparation and submission of tenders.

- Common formal and substantive errors during the preparation and submission of tenders.
- Simplified open procedure – specifics, common mistakes, and points for economic operators to watch out for.
- Insufficient understanding of selection criteria and their significance when preparing a tender.
- Inadequate definition and preparation of the technical tender in relation to the requirements set out in the tender documentation.
- Proper structuring and preparation of the financial tender, and common oversights. - Abnormally low price – risks for the economic operator, the obligation to provide justification, and practical aspects.
- Deadlines, electronic submission, and other practical aspects relevant to the validity of the bid.
- Clarification and supplementation of the bid – what can be clarified or supplemented, and what may lead to rejection.
- Practical examples.

4. Discussion and questions.

Programme coordinator

Iskra Belceva – Ristovska

Iskra has extensive experience in managing projects financed by the European Union in Macedonia, mainly for the development of institutions of public administration and supporting reforms aimed at EU membership. She was part of the management team of the contracting authority for IPA, where she was responsible for the functioning of IPA structures in the beneficiary institutions, capacity development, establishment and operation of the decentralized implementation system of IPA,quality control of tender documents and procedures, conducting numerous tender evaluations and coordinating all Twinning contracts.

Neda Maleska Sachmaroska

Neda Maleska Sacmaroska has long professional experience in the domain of organizational and institutional development both in public administration and civil society sector. Her special interests are in public policies and public administration, institutional and organisational development, strategy, human resource management and development, management of change.

Contact us via this form